Backsheets

Post Reply
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Backsheets

#1

Post by AE-NMidlands »

(not baksheesh, for those currently in Turkey!)
I am being offered these https://www.renugen.co.uk/trina-vertex- ... backsheet/
which have a white back-sheet.
It had never occurred to me that panels have back-sheets... why white?
And has anybody got experience of Trina panels?

(I specifically asked them to quote for polycrystalline panels as I know I can over-size the system and it will lower cost and mean less curtailment in summer... why quote for these monoctrystalline ones instead?)
A
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 2740
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: Backsheets

#2

Post by Stinsy »

The ones with black backsheets look "blacker". They are known as "all black". Basically the bits between the cells are black. I've heard if oyu live in a conservation area you need to have a black backsheet.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5732
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Backsheets

#3

Post by nowty »

AE-NMidlands wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 1:08 pm (I specifically asked them to quote for polycrystalline panels as I know I can over-size the system and it will lower cost and mean less curtailment in summer... why quote for these monoctrystalline ones instead?)
A
Your statement makes no sense to me whatsoever unless you have some strange aversion to monocrystalline panels.

EDIT - I think you mean the poly ones would be cheaper ?
16.9kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 25MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Re: Backsheets

#4

Post by AE-NMidlands »

nowty wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 2:47 pm
AE-NMidlands wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 1:08 pm (I specifically asked them to quote for polycrystalline panels as I know I can over-size the system and it will lower cost and mean less curtailment in summer... why quote for these monocrystalline ones instead?)
A
Your statement makes no sense to me whatsoever unless you have some strange aversion to monocrystalline panels.
EDIT - I think you mean the poly ones would be cheaper ?
Yes, I thought that polycrystalline panels were cheaper, performed less well per unit area at peak output but were "better" (meaning delivered a higher proportion of their peak output?) in diffused light conditions (overcast.)
Given that I can fit far more panels on my roof than I can export the power from (or soak up in battery re-charging or water-heating) I thought a higher output panel might not be cost-effective, because we wouldn't be able to make any sensible use of a significant proportion of the power for a lot of the year.
Why pay for top-performing panels if there is nowhere for the electrons to go?
A
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
smegal
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:51 pm

Re: Backsheets

#5

Post by smegal »

AE-NMidlands wrote: Fri May 13, 2022 7:58 pm
nowty wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 2:47 pm
AE-NMidlands wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 1:08 pm (I specifically asked them to quote for polycrystalline panels as I know I can over-size the system and it will lower cost and mean less curtailment in summer... why quote for these monocrystalline ones instead?)
A
Your statement makes no sense to me whatsoever unless you have some strange aversion to monocrystalline panels.
EDIT - I think you mean the poly ones would be cheaper ?
Yes, I thought that polycrystalline panels were cheaper, performed less well per unit area at peak output but were "better" (meaning delivered a higher proportion of their peak output?) in diffused light conditions (overcast.)
Given that I can fit far more panels on my roof than I can export the power from (or soak up in battery re-charging or water-heating) I thought a higher output panel might not be cost-effective, because we wouldn't be able to make any sensible use of a significant proportion of the power for a lot of the year.
Why pay for top-performing panels if there is nowhere for the electrons to go?
A
The supplier that I use (tradesparky) don't offer many poly panels. I think they are becoming obsolete. Back in the day, you paid a premium for mono panels, that doesn't seem to be the case any more.

I'm also not sure about the performance. I thought mono performed better in all situations.
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5732
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Backsheets

#6

Post by nowty »

There was some evidence in the early days about Poly panels being slightly more efficient in diffused light but if there is any advantage its so minute and is wiped out by general Monocrystalline performance in direct light. Remember direct light in winter is pretty weak so Mono would still win.

As to backsheets and all that, the all black ones are slightly less efficient due to running hotter with all the extra black colour on the frame and on the front / backsheet. Trina panels have been around for as long as I can remember so should be a good brand.

At the end of the day a cheaper larger array will still win over an expensive smaller array.
16.9kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 25MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Post Reply