New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

User avatar
Fintray
Posts: 1662
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#11

Post by Fintray »

AE-NMidlands wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 1:38 pm but it hasn't been edited...
Fintray was pointing out that it should have said
" They'd rather Consumers [i.e. us rather than the utility companies] pay wind companies vast fortunes to turn off their turbines when it is windy than pay consumers to use the excess."
That is exactly what I meant :xl: Why do we let it happen :evil:
3.87kWp PV
10.24kWp PV SolarEdge system
Tesla Powerwall 2
100 x 47mm Navitron tubes (still being installed!) Now likely to be removed for more PV.
MK2 PV router DHW diverter
Morso 5kW WBS
Vaillant AroTherm 10kW ASHP
Nissan Leaf
Swwils
Posts: 579
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:58 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#12

Post by Swwils »

Stinsy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 11:10 am
Swwils wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:53 am Counter argument to wide scale solar in the UK is the capacity factor.

If only energy was cheap, maybe some kind of spicy rocks that could be used for it.
I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist. However there is no reason for energy to be expensive what with the price of solar panels and the aforementioned knowledge of magic rocks!

There is a lot going on in the UK energy markets that doesn't make sense to me:
- They'd rather pay FF companies vast fortunes to generate power when the wind doesn't blow than pay consumers to use less.
- They'd rather pay wind companies vast fortunes to turn off their turbines when it is windy than pay consumers to use the excess.
It's a commodity market, that's how it works.
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3131
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#13

Post by Stinsy »

Swwils wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:19 pm
Stinsy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 11:10 am
Swwils wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:53 am Counter argument to wide scale solar in the UK is the capacity factor.

If only energy was cheap, maybe some kind of spicy rocks that could be used for it.
I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist. However there is no reason for energy to be expensive what with the price of solar panels and the aforementioned knowledge of magic rocks!

There is a lot going on in the UK energy markets that doesn't make sense to me:
- They'd rather pay FF companies vast fortunes to generate power when the wind doesn't blow than pay consumers to use less.
- They'd rather pay wind companies vast fortunes to turn off their turbines when it is windy than pay consumers to use the excess.
It's a commodity market, that's how it works.
The market isn’t working if they’d rather pay a FF company £1/kWh to generate than pay a consumer 25p/kWh not to consume!
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
Yuff
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 1:18 pm
Location: East Midlands

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#14

Post by Yuff »

And they want as all to drive EVs but if you can’t charge at home they are happy to rip everyone off and inconvenience them hugely…..
Mind you garages have been doing this for years…….. :head-bang:
Mitsubishi Ecodan
ASHP 8.5kW x 2
12 x 460w Solar panels
9.5kWh GivEnergy
Batteries x 2
EVs x 4 240 kWh Batteries
Ripple 5.8 kW PV 0.547 kW Whitelaw Brae
John_S
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 10:03 am
Location: West London

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#15

Post by John_S »

Apologies. It read ok with consumers where it was, so I thought it had been edited. but I am dyslexic.
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3131
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#16

Post by Stinsy »

John_S wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:42 am Apologies. It read ok with consumers where it was, so I thought it had been edited. but I am dyslexic.
It was OK with consumers as it was, and communicated the point I was making.

However Fin wanted to point out that additionally, it was us consumers who were paying the FF companies extortionate prices to pollute and us consumers who were paying the wind turbines to turn off...

The point was subtle and the semantics made it potentially confusing.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
Moxi
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:46 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#17

Post by Moxi »

Stinsy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:21 pm
Swwils wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:19 pm
Stinsy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 11:10 am

I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist. However there is no reason for energy to be expensive what with the price of solar panels and the aforementioned knowledge of magic rocks!

There is a lot going on in the UK energy markets that doesn't make sense to me:
- They'd rather pay FF companies vast fortunes to generate power when the wind doesn't blow than pay consumers to use less.
- They'd rather pay wind companies vast fortunes to turn off their turbines when it is windy than pay consumers to use the excess.
It's a commodity market, that's how it works.
The market isn’t working if they’d rather pay a FF company £1/kWh to generate than pay a consumer 25p/kWh not to consume!
Thats the flaw with the idea that private equity will spend millions to build generating plant and then wait patiently for the "scraps from the table" its a plain fact that if you build a generator you want your investment back and you want your profits. This is why its better for the investors to build renewable generation and chase a guaranteed return and leave any shortfall generation to a nationalised provider. Then you can incentivise people to save power.

As you say the free market model isnt fit for purpose under the current reimbursement mechanisms.

Moxi
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3131
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#18

Post by Stinsy »

Moxi wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:52 am
Stinsy wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:21 pm
Swwils wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 6:19 pm

It's a commodity market, that's how it works.
The market isn’t working if they’d rather pay a FF company £1/kWh to generate than pay a consumer 25p/kWh not to consume!
Thats the flaw with the idea that private equity will spend millions to build generating plant and then wait patiently for the "scraps from the table" its a plain fact that if you build a generator you want your investment back and you want your profits. This is why its better for the investors to build renewable generation and chase a guaranteed return and leave any shortfall generation to a nationalised provider. Then you can incentivise people to save power.

As you say the free market model isnt fit for purpose under the current reimbursement mechanisms.

Moxi
So, a bit like ho the BoE is "lender of last resort" a government owned-and-maintained FF plant could be "Generator of last resort"?
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
Moxi
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:46 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#19

Post by Moxi »

Its the only way I can see it working really, we the consumer still end up paying for the power and the infrastructure BUT it removes the last generator sets the unit cost element and allows the bulk generation market to become more competitive. There must be other ways and possibly better ways too to manage this but based on what we have at present it should move the market closer to a consumer beneficial model where the companies get a defined return on their investment and we get competitive power generation for say 95% of our power requirements.

Moxi

edited to remove spurious text at start of comment
Last edited by Moxi on Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Moxi
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:46 pm

Re: New Homes (Solar Generation) Bill Shot down.

#20

Post by Moxi »

Given the governments proclivity for nuclear they might decide that SMR's are their preferred generation model rather than FF but that depends on that technologies ability to respond quickly - its a possibility though |I suppose. If I were planning it though I think I would have considered a fast breeder reactor, that way you could operate it to transmute radioactive waste most of the time so its fully operational and running doing a job, then when you expect to need it for generation adjust the control rods and the neutron flux and bring the boilers online and bring the turbine up to standby ready to synchronise.

That way you have an asset doing a much needed job that can switch over to generation within the typical timelines that we need, you could also breed fuel at other times for sale internationally or to run the FBR.

Moxi
Post Reply