California retiring its concentrating solar thermal plants

Post Reply
dan_b
Posts: 1866
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

California retiring its concentrating solar thermal plants

#1

Post by dan_b »

https://cleantechnica.com/2021/09/20/wo ... -capacity/

Thought this was interesting - this tech has never really taken off - and it's being replaced by plain old solar PV.
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 2640
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: California retiring its concentrating solar thermal plants

#2

Post by Stinsy »

Utterly unsurprising. I'm sure a lot of people got rich raking in all the investment/ R&D money though. Someone on the radio was going on about Nuclear Fusion the other day, touting it yet again as "one breakthrough from providing unlimited, cheap, safe, power". However if the billions currently being funnelled into the various fusion research programs where instead spent on implementing: wind, solar, and storage technologies that already exist, we'd already have solved our energy needs.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
dan_b
Posts: 1866
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

Re: California retiring its concentrating solar thermal plants

#3

Post by dan_b »

I'm not sure whether the billions going into R&D into fusion (e.g. ITER in France) weren't being spent there, that they would instead be spent on actual deployment of existing tech. They're completely different sectors of the economy with different objectives and skillsets? But what it does do is allow the FUDSTERS to say "oh but there's this new tech round the corner (solid-state batteries, nuclear fusion, CCS, green hydrogen blah blah) so there's no point doing anything different NOW".

I can imagine that back in the 60s the idea of concentrated solar power seemed like a logical way of capturing sunlight energy to make electricity. But R&D was also being done on photovoltaics. And eventually that R&D paid off on an absolute global scale several decades later?
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 1816
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Re: California retiring its concentrating solar thermal plants

#4

Post by AE-NMidlands »

Isn't the problem that power plants using turbines usually depend on having a condensor system - which is why most big thermal power stations, coal or nuclear, are on big rivers, lakes or by the sea?
I have always wondered how these things work in hot dry places!

Then there is always the problem of people ("Entrepreneurs," or shysters in my mind) jumping on the bandwagon and milking it. SWMBO showed me another one today, looked like a (unidirectional) underwater delta-wing plane for putting in the Menai Strait - if I have remembered it correctly.

I think the one off the N coast of Scotland only has to cope with flows in 1 direction, doesn't the Menai Strait flow both ways?
A
2.0 kW/4.62 MWhr pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWhr batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWhr pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
Post Reply