sharpener wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 6:17 pmDifficult to see how fault current could flow back to the transformer earth, as although there may be an earth path there cannot be a live or neutral conductor going thereto as the relay in both of them will be open.Oldgreybeard wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:27 pm
TN-C-S/PME poses an interesting question for those with an eye for the fine detail. Because the regs now allow an additional intermediate to be installed in parallel with the incoming protective earth (or more accurately the PEN) then it isn't really TN-S when in EPS mode, simply because there may well be multiple earth fault current paths back through all the other PME earth electrodes, right back to the grid transformer.
But I do agree with you that converting the whole installation to TT (on grid) is much the best way forward. Fortunately I never got round to converting mine to TN-C-S in the first place as proposed by WPD some years ago.
My real concern is the PEN fault problem. I gather there are still lots of these every year and in the event of a power failure on the distribution side I would guess that the risk of there being a PEN fault as a part of that may be quite high. If this results in the potential of the incoming PEN rising (as it often seems to) then by leaving the PEN connected to the local earth electrode there is a risk that this could still rise to an unsafe touch voltage due to conditions outside the consumer's control. What's more, if this happens the incoming RCD on the grid supply won't see it, so that offers no protection either. Doesn't seem to me to make a lot of sense in retaining the PEN as the protective earth, in parallel with a local earth electrode, as it offers zero benefit, given that we no longer need a very low impedance earth fault path with RCDs, as we did when all we had were fuses/MCBs.