I didn't top balance my packs before installing

User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8364
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#91

Post by Joeboy »

Had a quick look this morning. If you know about PTech 88% and above readings, then you know.

If you don't, Pylontechs have a habit of sticking at 88% SOC for a long time then make a leap up towards 89% then very swiftly hit 100%. In my case they will stay at 100% and charging as power is flowing from the Ptechs to the LF280's.

Last night due to the low temps and low starting soc the stack hit 88% and stayed there for 45mins before 05.30 trigger and it then started to discharge.

Looking back to a better starting soc graph and thus hitting 88% earlier in the charge window I can see that the stack would sit at 88% soc for 2hrs 50 minutes given the chance. How long it would sit at 100% given the chance i don't yet know but i do know know that i'd quite like that extra 7kWh of power to be in the stack. Roll on delivery of the 1500W charger... :facepalm:
15kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN
42kWh LFPO4 storage
7kW ASHP
200ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
Tinbum
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 9:55 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#92

Post by Tinbum »

Mine do it at 89% give half a chance.😀
85no 58mm solar thermal tubes, 28.5Kw PV, 3x Sunny Island 5048, 2795 Ah (135kWh) (c20) Rolls batteries 48v, 8kWh Growatt storage, 22 x US3000C Pylontech, Sofar ME3000's, Brosley wood burner and 250lt DHW
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3056
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#93

Post by Stinsy »

Joeboy wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:30 am Had a quick look this morning. If you know about PTech 88% and above readings, then you know.

If you don't, Pylontechs have a habit of sticking at 88% SOC for a long time then make a leap up towards 89% the very swiftly hit 100%. In my case they will stay at 100% and charging as power is flowing from the Ptechs to the LF280's.

Last night due to the low temps and low starting soc the stack hit 88% and stayed there for 45mins before 05.30 trigger and it then started to discharge.

Looking back to a better starting soc graph and thus hitting 88% earlier in the charge window I can see that the stack would sit at 88% soc for 2hrs 50 minutes given the chance. How long it would sit at 100% given the chance i don't yet know but i do know know that i'd quite like that extra 6kWh of power to be in the stack. Roll on delivery of the 1500W charger... :facepalm:
I see this "sticking" at 88% too. And heard it described by others too.

I've always seen it as a symptom of the inherently inaccurate reporting of charge percentage. My guess is that the batteries hold a constant voltage while being charged. So while the actual amount of charge being held by the batteries increases this cannot be reported because the voltage stays flat.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
User avatar
Saladin
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2024 5:27 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#94

Post by Saladin »

Stinsy wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:35 am I've always seen it as a symptom of the inherently inaccurate reporting of charge percentage. My guess is that the batteries hold a constant voltage while being charged. So while the actual amount of charge being held by the batteries increases this cannot be reported because the voltage stays flat.
Agree. Specifically it's when a device is using voltage to infer SOC as opposed to the more accurate and expensive correct way of measuring it using a coulomb counting device or Ah counter.

You can always fit one externally.

I heart SImarine. Here's a cheap and cheerful alternative.

You can get away with voltage derived SOC with Li-ion. You definately can't with Lead Acid.
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3056
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#95

Post by Stinsy »

Saladin wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:25 pm
Stinsy wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:35 am I've always seen it as a symptom of the inherently inaccurate reporting of charge percentage. My guess is that the batteries hold a constant voltage while being charged. So while the actual amount of charge being held by the batteries increases this cannot be reported because the voltage stays flat.
Agree. Specifically it's when a device is using voltage to infer SOC as opposed to the more accurate and expensive correct way of measuring it using a coulomb counting device or Ah counter.

You can always fit one externally.

I heart SImarine. Here's a cheap and cheerful alternative.

You can get away with voltage derived SOC with Li-ion. You definately can't with Lead Acid.
Seeing as the percentage displayed is more for our entertainment because we're used to seeing our phones and laptops displaying it in that manner, then it doesn't really matter!
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
Tinbum
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 9:55 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#96

Post by Tinbum »

Saladin wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:25 pm
Stinsy wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:35 am I've always seen it as a symptom of the inherently inaccurate reporting of charge percentage. My guess is that the batteries hold a constant voltage while being charged. So while the actual amount of charge being held by the batteries increases this cannot be reported because the voltage stays flat.
Agree. Specifically it's when a device is using voltage to infer SOC as opposed to the more accurate and expensive correct way of measuring it using a coulomb counting device or Ah counter.

You can always fit one externally.

I heart SImarine. Here's a cheap and cheerful alternative.

You can get away with voltage derived SOC with Li-ion. You definately can't with Lead Acid.
I think the pylontech do coulomb count.
85no 58mm solar thermal tubes, 28.5Kw PV, 3x Sunny Island 5048, 2795 Ah (135kWh) (c20) Rolls batteries 48v, 8kWh Growatt storage, 22 x US3000C Pylontech, Sofar ME3000's, Brosley wood burner and 250lt DHW
User avatar
Saladin
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2024 5:27 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#97

Post by Saladin »

If that's the case it's a function of increased charge time due to diminishing charge current after the transition to CV absorption.

Phones and laptops have an compensatory algorithm. But that stops working as soon as the aging atrophy makes the batteries behave erratically.
e-bikes just use voltage to infer percent so I change the display to read voltage so I can use my noggin' instead and compensate for load/no-load.

It's pretty obvious to spot which it is, based on it's behaviour....eg. the percentage reserve raises when the load is dropped = voltage inference.

It mattered in lead acid days because charge completion at 90% SOC versus 120% SOC was the difference of 8 years extra service life.
Andy
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:16 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#98

Post by Andy »

This shows the 88% pause that the batteries did right from the start. I couldn't find a constant current example, but you could almost continue the prior charging straight line from 88% up to 100%. It was very strange behaviour. I read somewhere that it is balancing in that time.

Image
Andy
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:16 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#99

Post by Andy »

Saladin wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 4:44 am
Never turn off the PSU with the battery connected to the output you can damage it without the opposing voltage..you can use a diode to protect it but that'll mess with the meter accuracy. That said you need an highly accurate meter for this, it's unlikely a PSU display meter will have high enough resolution.
Hrrrrm, this is what I was doing with the Eltek. I used a smart switch to turn them off. It is still alive, but I am assuming from what you are saying I should leave it on but command zero current?
Last edited by Andy on Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Saladin
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2024 5:27 pm

Re: I didn't top balance my packs before installing

#100

Post by Saladin »

I damaged the display output on a PSU charging a battery and letting reverse current into the PSU after turning it off.
The higher the voltage of the battery the more likely you are to do harm.

You often get away with cells because the potential difference isn't that great.

Elteks are probably diode protected outputs because they're designed to be paralleled.

It's best practice to disconnect the PSU before you turn it off so current always goes to the battery instead of into the PSU.

Horses and courses depends on the PSU topology and potential difference whether there's an issue or not.
I'd be super cautious with anything over 12volt.

Shyt rolls down hill: current goes from higher voltage to low.
A good example of this is the way grid tied solar intrinsically goes to your domestic load before the grid.
Post Reply