subsea infrastructure vulnerability

Any news worthy story. Good things to watch at the Cinema, Theatre, on TV or have you read a good book lately?
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8276
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#61

Post by Joeboy »

Stinsy wrote: Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:43 pm It seems to be a very poorly designed system.

Surely the phones should work for calls from one property on the island to another? Surely there'd be a backup satellite/microwave connection even if this has much diminished capacity...
It doesn't take much to damage them. By their size and shape most nets will just go right over them. There's always one though, or if they drop n drag an anchor...

Thuraya sat phone as back up would be my choice.
15kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN
42kWh LFPO4 storage
7kW ASHP
200ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#62

Post by nowty »

More info from the Nord Stream investigation,

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy ... 022-11-02/

https://www.upstreamonline.com/safety/n ... -1-1345640

"According to preliminary results of the damage site inspection, technogenic craters with a depth of three to five metres were found on the seabed at a distance of about 248 metres from each other," Nord Steam said.

I had to look up "technogenic" and it means man made.
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 520 m3
Tinbum
Posts: 1145
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 9:55 pm

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#63

Post by Tinbum »

Would the sea bed not be sucked up by the gas rising?
85no 58mm solar thermal tubes, 28.5Kw PV, 3x Sunny Island 5048, 2795 Ah (135kWh) (c20) Rolls batteries 48v, 8kWh Growatt storage, 22 x US3000C Pylontech, Sofar ME3000's, Brosley wood burner and 250lt DHW
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8276
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#64

Post by Joeboy »

Tinbum wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 5:20 pm Would the sea bed not be sucked up by the gas rising?
Very little of it. A thin scrim laid over mud. Depending on the angle of the gas exiting it might form a scour pit but surprising how firm seabed actually is.
15kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN
42kWh LFPO4 storage
7kW ASHP
200ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#65

Post by nowty »

Another slant on the Nordstream attacks,

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/us ... 023-03-07/

Paywall removed version here,
https://12ft.io/proxy?ref=&q=https://ww ... 023-03-07/

WASHINGTON, March 7 (Reuters) - New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukraine group - likely comprised of Ukrainians or Russians - attacked the Nord Stream gas pipelines in September, but there are no firm conclusions, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 520 m3
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8276
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#66

Post by Joeboy »

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.thegua ... nes-report

I continue to think that this could have been done remote from a zodiac, sidescan sonar with a towed cam/fish, energised magnet and an acoustic trigger. Prime the lot in a 12 hr window.

4 days, heliox, sat, 2 tonnes of bang my arse,
15kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN
42kWh LFPO4 storage
7kW ASHP
200ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
Post Reply