Good point, and I did check to see if the article covered it, which it does here:HML wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:24 amHigh temperature heat pumps are largely a marketing exercise to try to convince readers of the Mail that they can actually work. To be efficient the still need to operate at as low a temperature as possible.Joeboy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:19 am Worth ensuring the most current tech is installed in this developing market?
Would not be happy to have a new install and its 20degC behind the leaders. Due diligence required.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67511954
The "high temperature" heat pumps they are talking about use R290 (propane) as the refrigerant. It's got advantages but it's not hugely better in performance than the other refrigerant that you're likely to come across, R32. Good R290 heat pumps perform better than R32 ones at low temperatures, less than 2C. Higher than that there's not much difference in performance, but there can be quite a difference in price.
My cheap R32 heat pump can operate up to 65C, more than high enough for most domestic heating purposes.
I'm interested in high temp HP's for two reasons. Firstly my house has 10mm microbore between the main pipes (28mm) and the rads, but the rads are all pretty large. Our gas consumption is pretty low, 6,400kWh last year (GCH + oven + DHW), but I'm not sure a conventional ASHP will work in the very worst conditions, perhaps 2 weeks, every other year. So it's an idea in the back of my mind, whilst expecting to run it at lower more efficient levels 99% of the time.Vaillant's aroTHERM plus heat pump works in outdoor temperatures as low as -20C and can supply hot water at up to 75C, though to remain efficient it is best not to exceed 55C, according to the manufacturer.
Secondly, my sister has a very large property, it's a home, business and smallholding. Following two large extensions (before they bought it) it's grown to about 2.25x the original build (late 1800's). It has a staircase at each end, and did have two oil boilers when they moved in, but now just the one, thanks to the work they've done.
But ...... they can't get the subsidy support for an ASHP, as the assesors don't believe it can get hot enough water to the extremes of the property. It's actually not as cold/leaky as I suspected, and with 10kWp of south facing PV to help contribute to heating and DHW through the year, I think an ASHP would be good. Again a HT unit might get them approval, even if the HT part is seldom needed.
[As an aside, does anyone have knowledge on polyurethane CWI? Their property is quite exposed, and they've been told that conventional CWI may not be suitable. I looked up polyurethane, and at first found nothing but negativity. But after a while the info seems to say that you need to use a good company who know what they are doing, otherwise it won't work well. But if done properly, it's fine, but about 2x the usual CWI cost. The front and one sidewall of the original building are still external, and solid no cavity, but some internal insulation on those, and I'd guestimate the external walls that are now internal, probably add 60-100tonnes of 'thermal mass' to help stabilise temps. External solid walls probably make up about 20% of the current external walls.]