What is the fire risk of the LIFE PO4 cells. Has any one done a test ?
Quote from Motor home solar.
While all lithium-ion batteries have the potential for thermal runaway, LiFePO4 batteries are less prone to this issue due to their stable chemical structure. They are also incombustible, able to withstand harsh conditions, and less likely to release flammable gases or catch fire in the event of a hazardous event.
When subjected to hazardous events, such as collision or short-circuiting, LiFePO4 batteries won’t release flammable gases or catch fire. This significantly reduces the chance of harm
Why are these not used in a bus / lorry
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... n-bus-fire
london-bus-operator-withdraws-electric-fleet
london-bus-operator-withdraws-electric-fleet
Last edited by ALAN/ALAN D on Sun Jan 14, 2024 4:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: london-bus-operator-withdraws-electric-fleet
They're heavier, slightly less mature and cheaper. New buses all use them, odds are that this is a slightly older model.
Re: london-bus-operator-withdraws-electric-fleet
It’s a shame the journalist didn’t do a bit more research and explain what MAY have happened.
A bit like the Luton car park incident…….
A bit like the Luton car park incident…….
Mitsubishi Ecodan
ASHP 8.5kW x 2
12 x 460w Solar panels
9.5kWh GivEnergy
Batteries x 2
EVs x 4 210 kWh Batteries
Ripple 5.8 kW PV 0.547 kW Whitelaw Brae
ASHP 8.5kW x 2
12 x 460w Solar panels
9.5kWh GivEnergy
Batteries x 2
EVs x 4 210 kWh Batteries
Ripple 5.8 kW PV 0.547 kW Whitelaw Brae
Re: london-bus-operator-withdraws-electric-fleet
I assume the batteries aren't in the rear staircase of the double decker bus?
Might not have anything to do with the high voltage traction battery at all?
Wonder which manufacturer supplied it - there's a fair chunk of BYD e-buses in London, but other marques too.
Might not have anything to do with the high voltage traction battery at all?
Wonder which manufacturer supplied it - there's a fair chunk of BYD e-buses in London, but other marques too.
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Re: london-bus-operator-withdraws-electric-fleet
I think you hit the nail firmly on the head.
Purely for comparison purposes, Tesla moved to LFP's for their standard range 3 and Y models, and were able to reduce costs. They didn't change the batts in the long range models, as the battery pack space wouldn't allow. LFP batts also can't send quite as much peak power, but that's of no importance to buses, trucks, and normal car driving.
Again purely for comparison, when the Tesla Megapack became the Megapack XL, it switched to LFP's. The pack has 50% more energy, but is 64% larger and heavier. Not that size and weight matters for stationary storage.
LFP's also remove the need for cobalt. Energy density of LFP's is steadily rising.
And now Sodium-ion is beginning to roll out, but this is even less energy dense (Wh/lt & Wh/kg) than LFP, but again it doesn't matter for stationary storage, nor smaller BEV's with smaller ranges, such as city cars.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.