Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

Any news worthy story. Good things to watch at the Cinema, Theatre, on TV or have you read a good book lately?
Post Reply
greentangerine
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2021 12:31 pm
Location: Dorset

Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#1

Post by greentangerine »

65 x Ø58mm SunnPro/Gledhill 450l
Solis Mini 4G 3kW/Sharp ND210/2.94kWp
SB1600/Sharp ND220/1.76kWp
SB1600/Kinve 235/2.115kWp
Dean Forge Croft Clearburn 11kW
SoFar ME3000/Pylontech 37.8kWh
Ecodan 14kW HP
MG4
PVOutput
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#2

Post by Stinsy »

Good job EVs barely use their friction brakes.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
6x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (14.4kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
smegal
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:51 pm

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#3

Post by smegal »

Stinsy wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:15 am Good job EVs barely use their friction brakes.
How are the anti EV brigade going to spin this one? They jump up and down about weight although roads are designed for heavier vehicles, and tyre wear etc.
Moxi
Posts: 2548
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:46 pm

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#4

Post by Moxi »

That reminds, I think I will be having to replace my tyres this year at the service time, mind you 22+ thousand miles off one set is better than what I get out my RAV 4 tyres generally so I can’t really complain.

Moxi
dan_b
Posts: 2538
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#5

Post by dan_b »

I wonder if the author is of the anti-EV brigade given this statement

"Dr James Parkin, from the University of Southampton and lead author of the study published in the journal Particle and Fibre Toxicology, said: “People generally associate pollution from cars as being from exhaust pipes and think of electric vehicles as having zero emissions. However, electric vehicles still produce particulate matter due to friction and wear of the road, tyres, and brakes."
smegal wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:39 am
Stinsy wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:15 am Good job EVs barely use their friction brakes.
How are the anti EV brigade going to spin this one? They jump up and down about weight although roads are designed for heavier vehicles, and tyre wear etc.
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
User avatar
Fintray
Posts: 1761
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#6

Post by Fintray »

dan_b wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 1:10 pm I wonder if the author is of the anti-EV brigade given this statement

"Dr James Parkin, from the University of Southampton and lead author of the study published in the journal Particle and Fibre Toxicology, said: “People generally associate pollution from cars as being from exhaust pipes and think of electric vehicles as having zero emissions. However, electric vehicles still produce particulate matter due to friction and wear of the road, tyres, and brakes."
smegal wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:39 am
Stinsy wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:15 am Good job EVs barely use their friction brakes.
How are the anti EV brigade going to spin this one? They jump up and down about weight although roads are designed for heavier vehicles, and tyre wear etc.
Having had a quick scan of the study I wouldn't say the author is of the anti-EV brigade at all, as the study is more into highlighting that the emissions from exhaust are not the only ones that are of concern and that the switch to EV's wont cure the problem of particulates that can cause us harm.
3.87kWp PV
10.24kWp PV SolarEdge system
Tesla Powerwall 2
MK2 PV router DHW diverter
Morso 5kW WBS
Vaillant AroTherm 10kW ASHP
Nissan Leaf
Mart
Posts: 1433
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#7

Post by Mart »

Stinsy wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:15 am Good job EVs barely use their friction brakes.
Very true, and the kinetic energy in a vehicle is half mass x velocity squared, so regen does even more of the work than we may realise.

30mph vehicle has 2.25x as much energy as 20mph, so even if you do have to brake, the re-gen can remove much of the energy first. And with one pedal driving, if you can avoid using the brakes, then the last bit done by the friction brakes is minimal. For example 30mph has 100x the energy of 3mph, rather than an assumed 10x.

I get the issue of tyre wear, but the article seems to focus too much on brakes and EV's .... weirdly?
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 3386
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#8

Post by Stinsy »

Moxi wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:27 pm That reminds, I think I will be having to replace my tyres this year at the service time, mind you 22+ thousand miles off one set is better than what I get out my RAV 4 tyres generally so I can’t really complain.

Moxi
I got 20k out of the set that came with my iD4. Considering EV-specific tyres don’t have as much tread as normal tyres to start with that isn’t bad at all.

Replaced the OEM Hankooks with e-Primacy. I wasn’t too bothered about EV-specific tyres but the Michelins were too cheap to turn down. So far performance has been great with the new tyres being much better getting away from the line. Horrendous in snow though, but the Golf GTE has CrossClimates on so I just use that when it’s white out.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
6x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (14.4kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
John_S
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 10:03 am
Location: West London

Re: Brake pad dust more toxic than exhaust emissions

#9

Post by John_S »

Stinsy wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 2:53 pm
I got 20k out of the set that came with my iD4. Considering EV-specific tyres don’t have as much tread as normal tyres to start with that isn’t bad at all.

Replaced the OEM Hankooks with e-Primacy. I wasn’t too bothered about EV-specific tyres but the Michelins were too cheap to turn down. So far performance has been great with the new tyres being much better getting away from the line. Horrendous in snow though, but the Golf GTE has CrossClimates on so I just use that when it’s white out.
38k miles and I am still on my original OEM tyres on my ID4. Confident that they will get through the 4yr service and MOT in April.
But then, I always get good mileage out of tyres.

I shall change them when the first one gets down to 3mm or before next winter which ever is first.
Post Reply