Oh dear, looks like they are planning on subsidy-farming for even longer by putting CCS on Drax to enable them to continue to burn trees and claim its carbon neutral, or somehow, "carbon negative". Such an obvious predatory delaying tactic.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... study-says
Drax-washing
Drax-washing
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Re: Drax-washing
Drax is the poster child for doing opposite of what you claim!
Felling trees the other side of the world, shipping it to the UK and burning it in an old coal power station can never be sustainable. Yet here they are gobbling up subsidies that could be used to build wind or solar.
Felling trees the other side of the world, shipping it to the UK and burning it in an old coal power station can never be sustainable. Yet here they are gobbling up subsidies that could be used to build wind or solar.
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger
(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger
(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)