Marcus wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 3:53 pm
If a structure was essentially well made to start with and/or has a lot of character/architectural merit then that may justify the extra expense or upgrading.
I think this house fits for character, I was a bit concerned about the solar panels but went ahead as the concrete tiles will not be original. I won't externally clad the two colour brickwork and particularly like the original 1862 lime mortar and am put off internal insulation because everything breathes as it is.
I can stick some celotex on the inside of the coombed ceiling but want to do it without changing the split lath and plaster on that side of the roof that did not burn.
House is 9" solid walls, 60cm foundation and floor was badly changed from suspended wood to solid with parquet somewhen between 1959 and 1969. No insulation and probably no damp proof membrane. I would dearly like to excavate the ground floor, one room at a time, to get decent insulation in and take the opportunity to have underfloor pipes as this would give thermal inertia to allow off peak heat pump heating.
Being totally wood fired for space heating it is a toss up whether I would live long enough to benefit after I give up chopping logs.
Has anyone any costings for laying a floor with a well designed underfloor pipe?