It was 4kWp of panels after (lengthy legal disputes) for the max rate, thereafter dropping in rate. But the scheme was changed later on so a higher amount (maybe 10kWp, I cannot remember) was included in the highest rate band.
Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
-
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
If domestic generation, is there likely to be an issue with the increased amount of current being offered to the local grid? or through your connection? Or are you just thinking of trying to store more in the shoulder months, and accept that it will stall in summer?
A
A
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
Limited by the inverter export limitations to grid and as you rightly say, will shutdown in Summer once all full at home.AE-NMidlands wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:36 am If domestic generation, is there likely to be an issue with the increased amount of current being offered to the local grid? or through your connection? Or are you just thinking of trying to store more in the shoulder months, and accept that it will stall in summer?
A
It is an interesting one as there are already hundreds of thousands of homes who took that first step. So likely to want to do more?
15kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN
42kWh LFPO4 storage
7kW ASHP
200ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
42kWh LFPO4 storage
7kW ASHP
200ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
Yes. At least that's the confirmation I have had from EDF (my FiT provider). So if you up the panels, or add additional panels, you need to tell them what the new Wp is, and they will apportion generation accordingly. So in your example, you'd provide the new (higher) generation figure, and they'd pay based on apportioning at 4:6 or 2/3rds.
But, double and triple check this, and get written (e-mail) confirmation from the FiT provider, as the advice and guidance is mixed, and highly confusing.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
Here you go, I found the OFGEM Decision on replacement generating equipment, published late last year.
Don't ask me to explain it, I think its meant to be not very clear, but I believe it does sort of allow it.
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/ ... 122021.pdf
Don't ask me to explain it, I think its meant to be not very clear, but I believe it does sort of allow it.
https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/ ... 122021.pdf
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
Many thanks Nowty, that's something I've been wrestling with for years giving advice to PV'ers on the MSE site. Most are/were convinced that any change to the capacity would invalidate FiTs, rather than result in apportioning.
This may seem silly, but your post has clarified an issue causing much debate and concern, for nearly a decade.
So, thanks again, and I take back what I said about your numberplate.
This may seem silly, but your post has clarified an issue causing much debate and concern, for nearly a decade.
So, thanks again, and I take back what I said about your numberplate.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
If you add additional PV can you do this on a seperate inverter or will this make for a battle of the inverters to establish the voltage? Ie one inverter establishes a voltage greater than grid in order to export but the other inverter sees this and increases its voltage to a higher value and so on.
Re: Octopus re-powering old wind turbines
Yes it works fine, subject to the usual DNO rules.Ken wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:20 pm If you add additional PV can you do this on a seperate inverter or will this make for a battle of the inverters to establish the voltage? Ie one inverter establishes a voltage greater than grid in order to export but the other inverter sees this and increases its voltage to a higher value and so on.
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3