Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

Water turbines and anything associated
CrofterMannie
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 5:29 pm

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#11

Post by CrofterMannie »

I haven't engaged with anyone from the Loch Kemp proposal so am just guessing but have wondered if one of the attractions of the site is that it is only a couple of km from Corriegarth windfarm and so they could have their own direct connection between wind farm and psh and bypass the grid charges.
8kw solar
ETA log boiler
5ha woodland
MG5EV
Oliver90owner
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 3:48 pm

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#12

Post by Oliver90owner »

I doubt it. Potential 69MW (on a few occasions) but only around 20MW on a more regular/average basis. Can the pumped hydro absorb wind generated power while feeding the grid? The pumped hydro grid connection would need to be increased beyond 600 MW?

I expect the projects will be looking at their options, all the same.
dan_b
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#13

Post by dan_b »

Plans for another new pumped hydro scheme

https://renews.biz/94661/sse-gilkes-for ... torage-jv/
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5543
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#14

Post by nowty »

dan_b wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 10:38 am Plans for another new pumped hydro scheme

https://renews.biz/94661/sse-gilkes-for ... torage-jv/
Official website.
https://fearnastorage.co.uk/
16.9kW PV > 107MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 22MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Mart
Posts: 1173
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#15

Post by Mart »

I might be miscounting or double counting, but just this thread seems to mention ~7GW of new(?) power delivery. That's a staggering amount of balancing for excess / shortfalls of wind energy in Scotland.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5543
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#16

Post by nowty »

Mart wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 11:45 am I might be miscounting or double counting, but just this thread seems to mention ~7GW of new(?) power delivery. That's a staggering amount of balancing for excess / shortfalls of wind energy in Scotland.
I make it an additional 7.45GWp and thats not including the Glen Eearach one as I cannot find details of its capacity.

Most battery storage plants only run for 1 or 2 hours at max capacity but some of these pumped storage plants can run for much longer with the Balliemeanoch one alone giving 1.5GW for 30 hours.
16.9kW PV > 107MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 22MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
smegal
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:51 pm

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#17

Post by smegal »

nowty wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:17 pm
Mart wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 11:45 am I might be miscounting or double counting, but just this thread seems to mention ~7GW of new(?) power delivery. That's a staggering amount of balancing for excess / shortfalls of wind energy in Scotland.
I make it an additional 7.45GWp and thats not including the Glen Eearach one as I cannot find details of its capacity.

Most battery storage plants only run for 1 or 2 hours at max capacity but some of these pumped storage plants can run for much longer with the Balliemeanoch one alone giving 1.5GW for 30 hours.
Is this the correct project?

https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest ... 7-05-2024/

GEE made several claims about the project, including that it would be using “water more efficiently than any existing or proposed pumped storage project in the UK” and that it would be “bigger than any other proposal or existing facility on Loch Ness in terms of size and power generation capacity”, which it listed as 2GW and 30GWh respectively.

Looks like those numbers are correct.
https://www.energyconsents.scot/Applica ... CU00005121
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5543
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#18

Post by nowty »

9.45GWp it is then. :shock:

Assuming they all get built of course.
16.9kW PV > 107MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 22MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Adokforme
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2021 10:09 pm

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#19

Post by Adokforme »

Having been on a short cruise, six miles total only on Loch ness this week has anybody else wondered just how many pumped hydro schemes it and Loch Locky could support both power and energy wise even if only hypothetically?
After all the technology has existed for decades so nothing really new just the desire to get on with it and solve our future energy needs away from FF's and Nuclear.
Just asking :facepalm: .
dan_b
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

Re: Planning submitted for new pumped hydro scheme

#20

Post by dan_b »

The timing of this is no coincidence i'm sure

https://renews.biz/94813/uk-hydro-indus ... nvestment/
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Post Reply