Ecodesign regulations inherently flawed?

Wood stoves, pellets and other bio-fuels
Post Reply
Mr Gus
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 9:42 pm
Location: Tofu eaters paradise (harrumph)

Ecodesign regulations inherently flawed?

#1

Post by Mr Gus »

I forgot about this statement from Burley...

https://burley.co.uk/wp-content/uploads ... icking.pdf
1906 ripplewatts @wind Turb-ine-erry
It's the wifes Tesla 3 (she lets me wash it)
Leaf 24
Celotex type insulation stuffed most places
Skip diver to the gentry
Austroflamm WBS
A finger of solar + shed full more
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 2640
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: Ecodesign regulations inherently flawed?

#2

Post by Stinsy »

Reminds me of the EU testing and certifying the efficiency of vacuum cleaners in an environment entirely free of dust!
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 7106
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: Ecodesign regulations inherently flawed?

#3

Post by Joeboy »

Sadly, sense is often trounced by regulatory flim flam. A sad read indeed. :(
16.6kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN & DW
Ripple 7kW WT & Gen to date 11MWh
42kWh LFPO4 storage
95kWh Heater storage
12kWh 210ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
Zoned GCH & Hive 2
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
Post Reply