Ah, missed the reference to EN 61851 in the standard, not very well laid out is it? Is this https://electrical.theiet.org/media/233 ... _final.pdf the current version.Swwils wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 6:06 pm The specially stamped sockets are not regular 13A sockets and are type tested differently - the back facing stamp is in conjunction with COP for proper labeling on he front or nearby to indicate it is suitable so it's a moot point often trotted out by those without the info or not working to best practice.
Car manufactures can say whatever they like and it wouldn't superseded the intentions of 61851, and yes I realise that an external heat pump, metal box outside in the wet drawing 20A is not subject to PEN fault protection so lol.
So after 3 pages of discussion, AINUI the BS1363-2 standard which has for >60 years defined sockets that will safely power electric fires and anything else that needs up to 3kW for long periods has become so debased that it has been de facto downrated to 10A, and even for that the mfrs have now to (self-)certify their products are suitable for continuous use(!) In which case why on earth did the standards committee allow mechanically interchangeble plugs for EV charging leads? They could have introduced a new type with a taller earth pin which would have been backwards-compatible, or stipulated a 16A commando plug or Schuko plug which were already in widespread use.
But the mess we are now left with has the public (including me) believing that the "granny lead" can safely be used wherever they fetch up at the end of a journey if there is a 13A outlet there. Try explaining all this to the man across the street who runs an extension lead across the pavement to his EV. I can see people will perhaps be willing to go to some lengths to install new EV charging points that comply, but as for pre-existing 13A power points, not a chance.
Either there is a real danger, in which case there is a need for a big public information campaign (where are the insurance companies in all this?). Or alternatively the fuss is disproportionate to the actual risks in which case it will be perceived as a make-work exercise for the trade.
Can't find what you are referring to, can you post a link @Swwils?