Renewable energy and sustainability discussions
https://camelot-forum.co.uk/phpBB3/
https://camelot-forum.co.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=3926
I don't understand the delay.
According to one of the speakers at the recent EE show at Excel Arena the hold up is purely down to the OEM's who won't release the software info until they can secure a cut of every transaction that takes place as a result and this is only likely to be resolved by regulation!I don't understand the delay.
Inverters that can take a 400V DC feed from solar and inject it in your house or the grid are cheap, reliable, and plentiful. Why do we have no inverters that can take 400V from an EV battery and inject it into the grid? The problem seems to be a software one that could be fixed by lunchtime given the correct motivation!
Yeah, I've heard that VW and Tesla want to present themselves as a "distributed power station". They've forgotten that the EVs and the energy stored within is the property of the EV-owner!Adokforme wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 12:51 pmAccording to one of the speakers at the recent EE show at Excel Arena the hold up is purely down to the OEM's who won't release the software info until they can secure a cut of every transaction that takes place as a result and this is only likely to be resolved by regulation!I don't understand the delay.
Inverters that can take a 400V DC feed from solar and inject it in your house or the grid are cheap, reliable, and plentiful. Why do we have no inverters that can take 400V from an EV battery and inject it into the grid? The problem seems to be a software one that could be fixed by lunchtime given the correct motivation!
The obvious solution would have been to have the inverter in the car and it squirt out electric through the AC terminals of the Type-2. However the powers that be decided against that and went for the CCS DC terminals and an external inverter being the only way that AC could be exported. The cars that use the Type-2 for V2L applications are ignoring the official spec.dan_b wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 5:00 pm Historically the car manufacturers have been wary of enabling V2L (bidirectional charging) due to concerns over battery lifespan - the worry being that allowing the customer to do multiple extra discharge cycles would prematurely age the battery and subject the OEM to additional battery warranty claims - as battery warranties are (at the moment) measured either by age or total mileage.
Also back in the early days, all Teslas were sold with unlimited lifetime free Supercharging - and Tesla was concerned about people basically filling up their batteries for free and then driving home and getting paid to inject their free electricity back into the grid and abusing the system that way.
It doesn't seem that difficult technically speaking to enable 3 or even 7kW AC discharge via the Type 2 CCS connector, and the concerns about battery cycles has rather gone away, so why isn't it a thing in all new EVs now already?