+ 1 to all that.Tinbum wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:55 amI'd agree. I always use concrete.AE-NMidlands wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:32 am I too would go for concrete straight off. Otherwise a few years down the line you will be buying "Concrete fence post repair spurs"
Screenshot 2024-11-29 at 09-27-36 Concrete Fence Post Repair Spur 4024.png
and it would have been much easier to put concrete in first.
However I have to admit that cheapo concrete posts aren't indestructible, some of our 30-year old ones have started to spall as the reinforcing has rusted. They are still doing the job, though.
saying that I did about 500m of fencing here and used treated timber and it started falling down within 7 years. Timber is not what it used to be and treatment has little effect. Timber was ok many many years ago as was creosote and would last a long time. So called 'creosote' is not what it used to be even if you get the industrial stuff. The only exception is what they seem to be able to use for telegraph and electricity poles.
I replaced a fence with material bought from Jacksons Fencing guaranteed for 20 years which I thought would see me out. Posts rotted at ground level after 6 years and they were very difficult about replacing under warranty. Their proprietary Jak-cure wood treatment seems no good, nothing much is any more since Tanalising was banned (it worked bc it contains copper arsenate, the copper kills fungi and the arsenic wood-boring insects).
Having hired an (expensive) Stihl power auger the first time I bought a Draper manual auger and it takes longer but makes good neat holes, much better and quicker than digging and you use less concrete. The shove-holer type of spade are difficult to use because of all the play in the joints.
Neighbour is now replacing his fence on the opposite side of us using concrete posts and gravel boards, it doesn't look as good when new but will soon weather and I know it will last. Previous ppl were always doing temporary repairs.