Wouldn't it be great if we could trust advertising and promotional blurb, and not have to assume it was untrue and misrepresentative of capability of the product being sold?Mr Gus wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 9:51 am Agreed Oliver, any marketing blurb / April needs to be pertinent to the country & maybe even regional variants summarised with all the general weather data to hand rather than shooting from the hip about other countries which smacks of deceit or contemptible ignorance of a sales team.
"I'm recording this for fact checking purposes" would scare the bejeesus out of strong arm selling practitioners.
I'm afraid the energy rush is going to have a lot of people seeing themselves as victims regardless of whether they are handed helpful paperwork that they couldn't be bothered to read & digest either though, nature of the beast.
Lying about the performance of products is normal, probably applies to pretty much everything, the only difference being the scale of the lies told by the marketing people. It seems we've come to accept that this is the way things should be, to the extent that we don't even care when our former prime minister tells blatant lie after blatant lie, even lying during his final departure speech.
Perhaps that's the root cause of the epidemic of untruth that seems so prevalent. People see our leaders and prominent people continually lie and assume that lying is an acceptable trait so they just copy that behaviour. Government regulators seem not to be bothered by companies lying, either. Witness my recent run in with SSE and the Ombudsman. The fact that SSE had submitted clearly false records to support their case wasn't highlighted or considered to be anything out of the ordinary by the regulator at all.
How the hell have we got to a state where so many people think it's absolutely fine to lie all the time?