methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

Any news worthy story. Good things to watch at the Cinema, Theatre, on TV or have you read a good book lately?
Post Reply
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#1

Post by AE-NMidlands »

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/ ... n-revealed:
Methane leaks alone from Turkmenistan’s two main fossil fuel fields caused more global heating in 2022 than the entire carbon emissions of the UK, satellite data has revealed.
Emissions of the potent greenhouse gas from the oil- and gas-rich country are “mind-boggling”, and an “infuriating” problem that should be easy to fix, experts have told the Guardian.
The data produced by Kayrros for the Guardian found that the western fossil fuel field in Turkmenistan, on the Caspian coast, leaked 2.6m tonnes of methane in 2022. The eastern field emitted 1.8m tonnes. Together, the two fields released emissions equivalent to 366m tonnes of CO2, more than the UK’s annual emissions, which are the 17th-biggest in the world.
Methane emissions have surged alarmingly since 2007 and this acceleration may be the biggest threat to keeping below 1.5C of global heating, according to scientists. It also seriously risks triggering catastrophic climate tipping points, researchers say.
What a shame it can't be piped away for sale, or used locally to generate electricity which could benefit the population or be exported...
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
Mr Gus
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 9:42 pm
Location: Tofu eaters paradise (harrumph)

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#2

Post by Mr Gus »

With it's poor human rights records it is RIPE for FOSSIL FUEL company plundering & enrichment of a few at a cost to the worst off.

Ex soviet country till 1991, now a "president for life" dictat.

" On 28 December 1999, Niyazov was declared President for Life of Turkmenistan by the Mejlis (parliament), which itself had taken office a week earlier in elections that included only candidates hand-picked by President Niyazov. No opposition candidates were allowed"

Gas via 3 pipelines to china.
Russian purchases were blocked (curtailed) some years ago after intervention from gazprom.

The wayback news piece from 2022 is an eye-opener as to context for the OP's piece..

"gas crater tourist attraction"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkmenis ... norama.jpg

https://web.archive.org/web/20220531233 ... a-59920221
1906 ripplewatts @wind Turb-ine-erry
It's the wifes Tesla 3 (she lets me wash it)
Leaf 24
Celotex type insulation stuffed most places
Skip diver to the gentry
Austroflamm WBS
A finger of solar + shed full more
Mart
Posts: 1336
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#3

Post by Mart »

Staggering losses, and environmental damage. The ageing Eastern European gas pipelines, plus the 'dodgy' shale oil/gas in the US is making everything so much harder.

But ..... (blatant attempt to spin some positivity) ..... there is a faint silver lining. This shows that the gains from moving away from FF's have a greater impact/benefit, than just the emissions when we burn them. Be it reduced emissions from fugitive emissions, or the huge amount of FF energy used to transport this energy, such as international shipping - transportation of FF's accounts for ~40% of shipping by mass.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Moxi
Posts: 2345
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:46 pm

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#4

Post by Moxi »

How strange i was only watching a video linked to this subject last night, ignore the advert mid point as the history and background info is interesting as much as it is disturbing:



Moxi
smegal
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:51 pm

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#5

Post by smegal »

According to google:

A single cow produces between 154 to 264 pounds of methane gas per year. Not counting for the emissions of any other livestock, 1.5 billion cattle, raised specifically for meat production worldwide, emit at least 231 billion pounds of methane into the methane into the atmosphere each year (Our World in Data).

231000000000 lb = 104779837.47 tonnes

104779837.47/100,000=104.77 million tonnes

So Turkmenistan emits over 3x more methane than ALL cattle in the world. Bearing in mind that this methane is form the ground, not the natural carbon cycle.

That's nuts!


I misread the methane emissions.
Last edited by smegal on Tue May 09, 2023 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#6

Post by nowty »

smegal wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 1:05 pm According to google:

A single cow produces between 154 to 264 pounds of methane gas per year. Not counting for the emissions of any other livestock, 1.5 billion cattle, raised specifically for meat production worldwide, emit at least 231 billion pounds of methane into the methane into the atmosphere each year (Our World in Data).

231000000000 lb = 104779837.47 tonnes

104779837.47/100,000=104.77 million tonnes

So Turkmenistan emits over 3x more methane than ALL cattle in the world. Bearing in mind that this methane is form the ground, not the natural carbon cycle.

That's nuts!
The article says its 2.6m tonnes of methane from Turkmenistan, the 366m tonnes quoted is the CO2 equivalent.

To put it in perspective, the world annual emissions of methane is 570 million tonnes.
https://www.iea.org/reports/methane-tracker-2020
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 27MWh generated
6 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 520 m3
smegal
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:51 pm

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#7

Post by smegal »

nowty wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 1:16 pm
smegal wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 1:05 pm According to google:

A single cow produces between 154 to 264 pounds of methane gas per year. Not counting for the emissions of any other livestock, 1.5 billion cattle, raised specifically for meat production worldwide, emit at least 231 billion pounds of methane into the methane into the atmosphere each year (Our World in Data).

231000000000 lb = 104779837.47 tonnes

104779837.47/100,000=104.77 million tonnes

So Turkmenistan emits over 3x more methane than ALL cattle in the world. Bearing in mind that this methane is form the ground, not the natural carbon cycle.

That's nuts!
The article says its 2.6m tonnes of methane from Turkmenistan, the 366m tonnes quoted is the CO2 equivalent.

To put it in perspective, the world annual emissions of methane is 570 million tonnes.
https://www.iea.org/reports/methane-tracker-2020
Serves me right from reading on my phone.
Marcus
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:25 pm

Re: methane emissions from Turkmenistan revealed

#8

Post by Marcus »

Yes, it is criminal what the ff industry is getting away with, but as long as we (collectively) are dependent on gas and oil, they've got us over a barrel and can (quite literally) get away with murder. That's actually my principle motivation for getting an ev, as the car is my last dependency on ff.

Another interesting article from September last year:-

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-62917498

The focus of the above article is the poisoning of large numbers of people in iraq through gas flaring, essentially by major companies such as BP, shell and so on, but because the flaring is done by (owned) subsidiary companies, it allows the big names to claim they don't do any flaring, and are meeting their legal requirements (I'm paraphrasing a bit as it's a while since I read the article). The article ends with the point that if all the gas that was flared off (globally, i think) was actually captured it would cover more than 90% of Europe's needs to replace russian imports.
450W hydro-electric
5110W pv
1.3kw Wt2 - not yet producing
6kWh lead acid - maybe 1kwh useable
LiMnCo battery made from 2nd hand hybrid car modules 3.6kwh nominal 24v.
300lt hot water tank and two storage heaters
ASHP Grant Aerona 3 10.5kw and UFH
Post Reply