I did also model an alternative layout with all panels in East/West orientation, and it does mean I can get 10 panels on the upper roof section rather than the 8 shown above. The numbers surprised me a bit... You get 26 panels in total rather than 20, and over the course of a year you do generate more power.MrPablo wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 10:19 am I know you have 20 panels in that plan, but I wonder if it's worth crunching the numbers to see how many panels could be fitted in a back to back east-west configuration on the top roof section.
That way you could eliminate the gap needed to prevent self-shading, still maintain a pitch sufficient for drainage and probably get more generation over the year.
However, (with the East-West config) in the summer when I will surely already have a vast excess, you increase your yield by 20% (compared to all panels facing south). But in winter, you get a fair bit more output with the all facing south option.
There is also the cost of more panels, and associated hardware.
But the install ends up looking so much cleaner, and wind should be less of a concern as the panels are tucked down at the edges of the roof.
December
East / West - 160.74 kWh
South - 202.2 kWh (+25% compared to E/W)
January
East / West - 203.48 kWh
South - 239.75 kWh