HPC

Any news worthy story. Good things to watch at the Cinema, Theatre, on TV or have you read a good book lately?
Mart
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: HPC

#101

Post by Mart »

AE-NMidlands wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 5:35 pm
Mart wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 5:16 pm
AE-NMidlands wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 3:32 pm
... except that they are abbreviations! E.g. a Quango is an acronym because you can say/pronounce it...
Well, if we are being unecessarily pedantic .....

I thought quango was a semi made up term (quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation) back when the press and 'a bloke down the pub', where trying to complain about NDPB's and ASPB's (non deparmental public bodies / Assembly sponsored public bodies). But those terms don't sound bad (unlike quango), and most people couldn't even name an NDPB, but they all needed to be banned ...... not understanding the role they do, such as the Environment Agency etc.

NDPB isn't exactly pronounceable. :whistle:
you could say that "unnecessarily pedantic" was a matter of taste anyway! I suspect that if you think a correction is necssary then by definition you are a pedant...
anyway, I found a definition online:
The word acronym typically applies when the resulting thing can be read as a word; for example, radar comes from "radio detection and ranging" and scuba comes from "self-contained underwater breathing apparatus." The word initialism only applies when the resulting thing is read as an abbreviation; for example DIY, which comes from "do it yourself," is pronounced by saying the names of the letters.
Hi, I think you missed the point, you were saying that quango was pronounceable, in order to correct Dan, and I was explaining that it is a made up (sort of) acronym, relating to NDPB's which isn't easily pronoucable. So just playfully correcting your correction. HTH.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Mart
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: HPC

#102

Post by Mart »

dan_b wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 2:36 pm TIL - another classic of the TLA genre

(TLA - three letter acronym!)
LOL.

Not quite a TLA, but one of my favourites is GIYF, since it's a great acronym, abreviation, acronym* to respond with if someone asks what your abreviation(s) means ..... assuming they have a sense of humour!

*Being Welsh, almost anything is pronounceable, it's just a question of having enough flem in your mouth, such as cwtch.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
dan_b
Posts: 2252
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

Re: HPC

#103

Post by dan_b »

Phlegm
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Mart
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: HPC

#104

Post by Mart »

dan_b wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:13 amPhlegm
Yep, bit of a hiccough(?) there, but how very dare you sir, my spellunking is near porfick ..... much of the tim. :fight:
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
dan_b
Posts: 2252
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

Re: HPC

#105

Post by dan_b »

Hiccup is the correct and original spelling.

In the 18th century, it was altered to Hiccough as people thought, incorrectly, it was a cough-related reflex, but the pronunciation was kept the same as it was so familiar.

So hiccup is the proper way and hiccough is a temporary affectation which should be avoided.
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
Mart
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: HPC

#106

Post by Mart »

"a temporary affectation which should be avoided." Sounds a bit like me.

Best not mention rooves then! :facepalm:
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Mart
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: HPC

#107

Post by Mart »

This is gonna shock everyone, but the cost of decommissioning Sellafield may go up?

Sellafield cleanup cost rises to £136bn amid tensions with Treasury
National Audit Office questions value for money as predicted bill for decommissioning increases by £21bn

The cost of cleaning up Sellafield is expected to spiral to £136bn and Europe’s biggest nuclear waste dump cannot show how it offers taxpayers value for money, the public spending watchdog has said.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.
Moxi
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:46 pm

Re: HPC

#108

Post by Moxi »

Ha ha that's the funniest thing I have read in ages!

Only the government could be so naïve as to think the budgets provided by the teams at Sellafield are anything better than informed guesses.

They could do worse than bus the whole of the house of commons up to the site and take everyone around the site and show them all the problems, not the VIP tour, I mean get them trained dressed and mask fit and show them the problems. Then they might get an idea of just how expensive the nuclear deterrent and power generation actually has been historically.

Dont get me wrong there's often been very wasteful projects but they are usually born of and impacted by managerial and political expediency rather than engineering and scientific error.

All they need to do to find "value" for money for the site is to contemplate what the impact would be of a fire, explosion or other catastrophic loss of containment at one of any number of decrepit facilities and how much that would subsequently cost to rectify - then the current guess on costs will look very reasonable!

If the treasury wants to get angry then they need to dig up Mr Attlee and Mrs Thatcher and have a very strong conversation because that's where the costs originated, its no good moaning at the present group of people wrestling with the national legacy issue.

Moxi
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5745
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: HPC

#109

Post by nowty »

Mart wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:54 am This is gonna shock everyone, but the cost of decommissioning Sellafield may go up?

Sellafield cleanup cost rises to £136bn amid tensions with Treasury
National Audit Office questions value for money as predicted bill for decommissioning increases by £21bn

The cost of cleaning up Sellafield is expected to spiral to £136bn and Europe’s biggest nuclear waste dump cannot show how it offers taxpayers value for money, the public spending watchdog has said.
Sounds like my 5 years of experience in the Nuclear Industry in the 80’s, :?

Europe’s most hazardous industrial site has previously been described by a former UK secretary of state as a “bottomless pit of hell, money and despair”.

I still get occasional nightmares where I am back working in some of the dirty buildings. :shock:
16.9kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 25MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
User avatar
Fintray
Posts: 1524
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: HPC

#110

Post by Fintray »

Moxi wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 9:25 am If the treasury wants to get angry then they need to dig up Mr Attlee and Mrs Thatcher and have a very strong conversation because that's where the costs originated, its no good moaning at the present group of people wrestling with the national legacy issue.

Moxi
Nooo, I think a lot of people would agree she's in the best place for her, didn't they build a huge concrete cover over her, erm no that was Chernobyl, both pretty toxic...
3.87kWp PV
10.24kWp PV SolarEdge system
Tesla Powerwall 2
100 x 47mm Navitron tubes (still being installed!) Now likely to be removed for more PV.
MK2 PV router DHW diverter
Morso 5kW WBS
Vaillant AroTherm 10kW ASHP
Nissan Leaf
Post Reply