I think this argument can be carried through to the emissions side too, even if assume all of the HP leccy comes from marginal/additional gas generation.Stinsy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 12:43 pm
Gas is about 6p/kWh and Peak electric is about 25p/kWh. A gas boiler is possibly 80% efficient whereas a HP is about 350% efficient.
That makes gas heating cost 7.5p/kWh of heat output and a HP cost about 7.1p/kWh of heat output (at peak prices). So a HP is financially viable even on peak electric. However if you're running your HP on timeshifted ToU electric then the heat is as good as free!
So using your numbers, 1kWh of gas will produce 0.8kWh(t) of heat.
But that same 1kWh of gas, burnt at a CCGT powerstation will produce 0.5 to 0.6 kWh of leccy. Assuming 6% grid losses, the heat pump in the house will recieve 0.47kWh to 0.56kWh of leccy. Which will produce 1.65kWh(t) to 1.97kWh(t) of heat, for the same amount of gas burnt / emissions.
Using my 'best case for gas' numbers, we get 0.9kWh(t) from the boiler v's 1.29kWh(t) from the HP, or 1.5kWh(t) at a SCOP of 2.9.
But just to stress, that's not the real/average emissions from leccy, that's a comparison of gas boiler, to HP running on gas generated leccy, effectively a worst case scenario.