The return of the chocolate teapot

Wind turbines
Post Reply
dan_b
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:16 am
Location: SW London

The return of the chocolate teapot

#1

Post by dan_b »

https://electrek.co/2022/10/14/rooftop-wind-solar/

Oh here we go again - another rooftop wind turbine that's meant to save the world. Only this time, it doesn't have any moving blades!
Colour me sceptical, but this is yet another chocolate teapot. Why do people continue to fall for this nonsense.
Tesla Model 3 Performance
Oversees an 11kWp solar array at work
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5833
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: The return of the chocolate teapot

#2

Post by nowty »

"...................easily installs on the edge of a building and can generate up to 50% more energy at the same cost as rooftop solar."

Thats a beauty, probably means it generates 50% more in the middle of the night. :lol:

But also reduces PV generation on the same roof because of the shadow it casts on the rest of the roof. :evil:

It gets my "Solar Freakin Roadway" award.
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Bugtownboy
Posts: 974
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2021 12:35 pm

Re: The return of the chocolate teapot

#3

Post by Bugtownboy »

But it does have moving blades - they’re inside the box the aerofoils sit on. I presume the air flow through the aerofoils creates a negative pressure, pulling air through the small turbine in the ‘box’.

As with the author, you’d hope that BASF’s interest gives it some credibility.
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: The return of the chocolate teapot

#4

Post by Oldgreybeard »

This statement from that article worries me:
The first thing I do when I come across innovations like this is look to see if there’s any commercial interest. If BASF is piloting this product, then that signals potential.
There are so many cases of investors, even reputable investors, getting scammed to invest in products that simply don't work as suggested, that I would state categorically that investor interest is the least reliable way to assess whether it works. What's needed is independent testing and evaluation, much as has been done by some here buying similar products and evaluating them.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
Mr Gus
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 9:42 pm
Location: Tofu eaters paradise (harrumph)

Re: The return of the chocolate teapot

#5

Post by Mr Gus »

My thoughts exactly, seeing as the brash yank was trying to gun down other renewables along the way he needs to give clarity to even vaguely be believed its not investment hyping bull.

This item, in reality is likely a mere "Turd de chocolat"

Note th nice flat foof? ..wonder what the weight of the unit is & the bracing alterations needed internally.

Go test em down tornado alley in St Louis area fella.
1906 ripplewatts @wind Turb-ine-erry
It's the wifes Tesla 3 (she lets me wash it)
Leaf 24
Celotex type insulation stuffed most places
Skip diver to the gentry
Austroflamm WBS
A finger of solar + shed full more
Post Reply