Mart not sure I really follow what you are getting at. If someone has a Zappi, then presumably their main reason for getting one is to charge an EV. It will, surely, make more sense to charge an EV directly rather than charge batteries to then charge the EV. If you are going to heat water then again why charge batteries to then heat water?Mart wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 8:45 am Apologies if this has been mentioned, but my skim read this morning noticed quite a few mentions of Zappi (or similar). Not in any way knocking the tech nor idea, and the same for water heater diversion switches, but ....... if anyone has a battery, or will be getting one in the future, then is the technology needed?
The diversion devices avoid export of spare PV, a great idea, but if the battery is catching that excess, then you can charge the car, water tank, or A2A unit from the battery (buffer)?
Hope that makes sense.
If the PV is producing a high amount then choosing which to put the energy into first will, presumably vary, if a long trip is planned then chrging the EV fully may be the priority, if not expecting to go out for a couple of days then charging the batteries first may be most beneficial, if expecting to have a famiy all needed a bath due to muddy activity then hot water may be essential. If everything is fully charged then exporting the remainder, even if you get nothing for it, benefits others.
Depening on what tech you have installed on the RE sie it might be that the batteries cannot take all the PV power you are producing so diverting to a secondary, or even tertiary destination would make sense.
Like most technology, it is needed or just wanted, do we really need to have home batteries or could we just rely on the grid? Giving flexibility to how we utilise what we are producing is surely beneficial, but not everyone will need every option.
Just my tuppence worth on what is probably a very philisophical question rather than a technical one.