but not if you "only" want heat out - and that heat nearby rather than at a distance where generation and transmission losses would be less than the cost of a steam main. This is for district heating where it is built.openspaceman wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 11:42 amYes or run your own nichrome wire through the box. 500C is pretty hot so safety is an issue, Also heat loss will be related to the square of the surface area and capacity will be related to the cube of the dimensions so huge is better.
If the sand is graded to one size class then the pores will be about 30% of the volume and air will travel though that well.
I still think compressed air would be a better way to store the energy for most purposes
I would think that hoping for an airflow through sand is pretty hopeless unless it is a fluidised bed. The original article talks about a heat exchanger, so I would imagine electric elements buried in the sand (any old sand, it says, rather than special sharp sand or whatever to maintain an open structure) and a heat extraction airflow through dry tubes in the sand box.
That way there is no movement of the sand to break it down, nor erosion of your heat exchanger by sand grains in the airflow.
A