Liz's energy subsidy.

marshman
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2021 7:58 pm

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#11

Post by marshman »

Oldgreybeard wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:38 am
Stinsy wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:08 am I really don't understand why anyone would be on Economy7 when they could be on Octopus Go!
Because Go is unavailable here, that's why. Also Go doesn't have the built in time switch that E7 has, and for the housing association homes that tamper-proof timing is a key requirement. There are still over 4 million E7 users, many of them tied in because there are no other options where they live.
What he said + can't get a smart meter here out in the sticks either + don't have an EV (yet), so stuck with E7 as the least worst option. Gas never an option as there is none.
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 2799
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#12

Post by Stinsy »

NikoV6 wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:52 am £100billion, pretty sure you could insulate every home in the UK for that....
You could build 500,000 passivhaus social houses for that much!
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#13

Post by Oldgreybeard »

marshman wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:54 am What he said + can't get a smart meter here out in the sticks either + don't have an EV (yet), so stuck with E7 as the least worst option. Gas never an option as there is none.
Mirrors our situation, no smart meters available (SSE tried hard to get one to work here then gave up after about 6 months and many trips out to try and sort it, and fitted a new E7 meter). Nearest mains gas is probably Shaftesbury, around 10 miles away, and there was never any prospect of getting gas out here. Locally most people use oil, some use LPG and the housing association estate uses storage heaters, put in a couple of years ago.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
User avatar
Fintray
Posts: 1539
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#14

Post by Fintray »

Stinsy wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:57 am
NikoV6 wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:52 am £100billion, pretty sure you could insulate every home in the UK for that....
You could build 500,000 passivhaus social houses for that much!
What! Build houses that once completed would hardly use any energy, the new energy minister and his investments wouldn't like that at all.
3.87kWp PV
10.24kWp PV SolarEdge system
Tesla Powerwall 2
100 x 47mm Navitron tubes (still being installed!) Now likely to be removed for more PV.
MK2 PV router DHW diverter
Morso 5kW WBS
Vaillant AroTherm 10kW ASHP
Nissan Leaf
spread-tee
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 7:16 pm
Location: ville of spiky things

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#15

Post by spread-tee »

Fintray wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 12:22 pm
Stinsy wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:57 am
NikoV6 wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:52 am £100billion, pretty sure you could insulate every home in the UK for that....
You could build 500,000 passivhaus social houses for that much!
What! Build houses that once completed would hardly use any energy, the new energy minister and his investments wouldn't like that at all.
If he had half a brain he would invest in Passive house builders instead, think of the Tax revenues that would create too?

Desp
Blah blah blah
User avatar
SafetyThird
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:32 am
Location: North Devon

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#16

Post by SafetyThird »

Stinsy wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:08 am I really don't understand why anyone would be on Economy7 when they could be on Octopus Go!
Octopus aren't taking new customers onto Go. I enquired several months ago. After years of heating with wood, we have the GSHP and I wanted to move us from E7 onto Go but can't do that until they open up to new customers. Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to get a smart meter, if they can fit one to our situation (split phase E7) out in the country.

Meanwhile, I'm installing batteries to go with our solar panels and hoping I'll be able to charge using E7 over night and store enough to get us through most of the winter days.
6kw PV (24 x REC Solar AS REC 250PE)
Clausius 5-25kw GSHP
Luxpower Squirrel Pod
Pylontech 21kwh
Eddi Diverter
250l hot water tank with 2 immersions
2 x Woodwarm stoves
7 acres of old coppice woodland
Ripple Kirk Hill 3.8kw
Ripple Derril Water 3.963 kW
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#17

Post by Oldgreybeard »

SafetyThird wrote: Thu Sep 08, 2022 1:50 pm
Stinsy wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:08 am I really don't understand why anyone would be on Economy7 when they could be on Octopus Go!
Octopus aren't taking new customers onto Go. I enquired several months ago. After years of heating with wood, we have the GSHP and I wanted to move us from E7 onto Go but can't do that until they open up to new customers. Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to get a smart meter, if they can fit one to our situation (split phase E7) out in the country.

Meanwhile, I'm installing batteries to go with our solar panels and hoping I'll be able to charge using E7 over night and store enough to get us through most of the winter days.

E7 with batteries works well we've found. The 7 hour charge period is a significant advantage if you have other loads that are on overnight, too, as it allows the charge power to be dialled down a bit to avoid overloading the supply. In our case we can get close to the supply maximum overnight, with the car charging, the hot water heating and the battery charging, especially overnight once in every three days when our well water filtration system backwashes the sand filter and runs the pump for half an hour or so.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
richbee
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2022 3:39 pm
Location: Northumberland

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#18

Post by richbee »

Fintray wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 12:22 pm
Stinsy wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:57 am
NikoV6 wrote: Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:52 am £100billion, pretty sure you could insulate every home in the UK for that....
You could build 500,000 passivhaus social houses for that much!
What! Build houses that once completed would hardly use any energy, the new energy minister and his investments wouldn't like that at all.
Yes, stop coming up with sensible ideas - we didn't get where we are today with sensible ideas!
Interesting to read that Truss's biggest donor for the leadership campaign was the wife of a BP director
Solar PV since July '22:
5.6kWp east/west facing
3.6kW Sunsynk hybrid inverter
2x 5.12kWh Sunsynk batteries
1.6kWp Hoymiles East/West facing PV on the man cave
Ripple DW 2kW
Ripple WB 200W
Oliver90owner
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 3:48 pm

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#19

Post by Oliver90owner »

All her efforts, over the last couple of months, or so, have been to win over any of the tory membership who were eligible to vote.

OK, she may have tried to gloss over, or not mention, anything that might cause alarm with general populace, but the only real target audience was for those who would be likely benefit from her becoming PM than Sunak.

Now, it is different. She now has to ‘hide’ any benefits to her (wealthy) supporters while trying to gain sufficient support from the electorate (as a whole) to get herself re-installed at the next election. I foresee some huge future debts being accumulated for future generations, in the hope of the unknowing electorate voters thinking she has saved them. What might happen in a future term of office may not be the same again.

I remain ‘fairly’ agnostic about the colour of the party in office (prefer blue over red, I suppose, on balance), but fully realise the tory voters voted for themselves - not for the real benefit of the country - in the recent vote. That is politics, through and through.

Last year, they couldn’t care that us pensioners were provided with a reduced pension increase - they were not up for election, were they?

Whatever hand-outs are up-coming will have to be - eventually - paid for from taxes. There is no getting around that. Perhaps I should not worry about that as it will likely not be me that pays back that debt. Much like hinkley c, as I see it.
Phoooby
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:19 pm

Re: Liz's energy subsidy.

#20

Post by Phoooby »

The cost seems bonkers, £150bn estimate and that assumes prices will be down to acceptable level in 2 years time. If prices are still high, what happens then.

I think Rishi had a better idea of targeting support where needed to lower incomes to keep the cost under control. People on higher incomes £50-60k should be able to cope with these bumps in the road. The Furlough scheme, which I thought was to generous as well, seems to have opened the floodgates on everyone expecting the Gov to bail them out. There are plenty of low earners, fixed incomes, disabled who will need help immediately to pay bills. With the £5-6k per house that they are now estimating, some should have been allocated for insulation, new boilers or heat pumps, possibly solar to create long terms savings and less just handed out to high earners who have the means to sort things out themselves.

Nothing about business assistance. If businesses start to fail or just reduce hours, people wont be able to pay any bills, let alone subsidised ones.

Very few commentators on the MSM seem to have pointed out that this £150bn of increased national debt is being transferred directly to BP and Shell etc over the next few years. Yes, they may tax the profit a bit more than usual but that is only clawing back a bit. The general population just seem blinkered in wanting cash to pay bills and not bothered by the consequences.
Post Reply