Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

Mr Gus
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 9:42 pm
Location: Tofu eaters paradise (harrumph)

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#11

Post by Mr Gus »

Solar edge used to have more detail (conversation) but as the forum moved , a lot of knowledge was lost, lucky for us we have an OGB ;)

As far as spares are concerned have you tried cracking the lid & identifying components & their values yet? ..if you start a list on the internet someone will find & add to it eventually.
Last edited by Mr Gus on Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
1906 ripplewatts @wind Turb-ine-erry
It's the wifes Tesla 3 (she lets me wash it)
Leaf 24
Celotex type insulation stuffed most places
Skip diver to the gentry
Austroflamm WBS
A finger of solar + shed full more
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#12

Post by Oldgreybeard »

If anyone wants to get data from the Sofar Modbus then this is the method that I pretty much copied: https://github.com/cmcgerty/Sofar2mqtt

I used a slightly different display and put the whole thing in a small plastic box, with a power supply module (just to save having a 5V power brick plugged in the outbuilding where this lives). The WiFi connects to the house LAN and then Home Assistant runs the Mosquito MQTT broker which just pulls data from the ESP8266 module and makes it available to any HA integration.
Sofar MQTT.jpg
Sofar MQTT.jpg (130.52 KiB) Viewed 1036 times
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
marshman
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2021 7:58 pm

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#13

Post by marshman »

For anyone with a Solis inverter Ginlong publishes a very useful document giving full details of the ModbusMap for their inverters.

You can download it from here:

https://ginlongsolis.freshdesk.com/supp ... -inverters
User avatar
Fintray
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#14

Post by Fintray »

Mr Gus wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:23 am Solar edge used to have more detail (conversation) but as the forum moved , a lot of knowledge was lost, lucky for us we have an OGB ;)

As far as spares are concerned have you tried cracking the lid & identifying components & their values yet? ..if you start a list on the internet someone will find & add to it eventually.
If you are referencing the Solaredge optimisers my advice is don't bother as I had one fail, which was promptly replaced under warranty, I opened the failed unit only to find the entire circuit board is encased in potting compound.
3.87kWp PV
10.24kWp PV SolarEdge system
Tesla Powerwall 2
100 x 47mm Navitron tubes (still being installed!) Now likely to be removed for more PV.
MK2 PV router DHW diverter
Morso 5kW WBS
Vaillant AroTherm 10kW ASHP
Nissan Leaf
Mr Gus
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 9:42 pm
Location: Tofu eaters paradise (harrumph)

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#15

Post by Mr Gus »

Grr, that's annoying, ..epoxy resin or something else? (Not great potential for failure analysis nor recovery & recycling I anticipate)
1906 ripplewatts @wind Turb-ine-erry
It's the wifes Tesla 3 (she lets me wash it)
Leaf 24
Celotex type insulation stuffed most places
Skip diver to the gentry
Austroflamm WBS
A finger of solar + shed full more
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#16

Post by Oldgreybeard »

On the plus side they have a very good warranty, 25 years IIRC.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
marshman
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2021 7:58 pm

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#17

Post by marshman »

Mr Gus wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:22 pm Grr, that's annoying, ..epoxy resin or something else? (Not great potential for failure analysis nor recovery & recycling I anticipate)
No, but good for hermetically sealing electronics in harsh environments and generally ensuring a longer life - assuming correct margins have been designed in for thermal conductivity etc. I see far too many circuit boards with inadequate (read none!) protection from moisture, corrosion etc. which ultimately shortens the life of the device. Chances are the components are mainly SMT (surface mount), not well marked (not enough room on the device) so even if not "potted" chances of repair would be slim.

25 year warranty says it all really, they have confidence in their design and construction.
Mr Gus
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 9:42 pm
Location: Tofu eaters paradise (harrumph)

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#18

Post by Mr Gus »

It certainly does make me view the product & the price differently, hope the 25yr warranty is backed up properly.
Thanks MM, I'd only heard folk talk of failed units that had cost them an arm & a leg, not the warranty scenario.
1906 ripplewatts @wind Turb-ine-erry
It's the wifes Tesla 3 (she lets me wash it)
Leaf 24
Celotex type insulation stuffed most places
Skip diver to the gentry
Austroflamm WBS
A finger of solar + shed full more
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#19

Post by Oldgreybeard »

marshman wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:54 pm No, but good for hermetically sealing electronics in harsh environments and generally ensuring a longer life - assuming correct margins have been designed in for thermal conductivity etc. I see far too many circuit boards with inadequate (read none!) protection from moisture, corrosion etc. which ultimately shortens the life of the device. Chances are the components are mainly SMT (surface mount), not well marked (not enough room on the device) so even if not "potted" chances of repair would be slim.

25 year warranty says it all really, they have confidence in their design and construction.
I remember a tear down of a Solaredge optimiser, looking at the design and why they were able to give that long warranty. Apart from the potting to keep moisture out, the one take away from that I remember was that they use very long life capacitors. I believe this was related to the relatively low power handling of each unit, that enabled them to avoid using electrolytics, and by doing that the most failure prone component was eliminated from the design.

It does seem that big capacitors are the weakest point of a lot of high power electronics. I have wondered whether it might be worth pre-empting failure on our 8 year old inverter by replacing all the capacitors before it goes wrong.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
marshman
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2021 7:58 pm

Re: Solaredge Monitoring Offline ?

#20

Post by marshman »

Oldgreybeard wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 6:22 pm
marshman wrote: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:54 pm No, but good for hermetically sealing electronics in harsh environments and generally ensuring a longer life - assuming correct margins have been designed in for thermal conductivity etc. I see far too many circuit boards with inadequate (read none!) protection from moisture, corrosion etc. which ultimately shortens the life of the device. Chances are the components are mainly SMT (surface mount), not well marked (not enough room on the device) so even if not "potted" chances of repair would be slim.

25 year warranty says it all really, they have confidence in their design and construction.
I remember a tear down of a Solaredge optimiser, looking at the design and why they were able to give that long warranty. Apart from the potting to keep moisture out, the one take away from that I remember was that they use very long life capacitors. I believe this was related to the relatively low power handling of each unit, that enabled them to avoid using electrolytics, and by doing that the most failure prone component was eliminated from the design.

It does seem that big capacitors are the weakest point of a lot of high power electronics. I have wondered whether it might be worth pre-empting failure on our 8 year old inverter by replacing all the capacitors before it goes wrong.
I wouldn't worry. Wait until it fails then either repair or replace - probably replace with a more efficient inverter.

In my view electrolytic capacitors have developed a bad "rap" due to a spate of failures of capacitors produced in the early 2000's. Just Google "capacitor plague"! I remember repairing many failed switch mode power supplies in everything from PC power supplies to PSU boards in set top boxes. In recent years the only failures caused by failed electrolytic caps I have seen have been in products produced in that era, or using components produced in that era. It is a known and documented problem caused by "dodgy" electrolyte produced in Taiwan. It was a massive problem for the industry. It was exacerbated by poor design where components were underspecified. Decent designs would use well specified components with wide temperature ranges, low ESR (internal resistance) etc. with care taken to minimise peak currents. All of which stress the capacitor and with the poor quality electrolyte led to early failures. A capacitors worst enemy, as with nearly all electronic components, is heat - but they are particularly vulnerable as it degrades the electrolyte. So a decent design, with comfortably rated components with adequate cooling/ventilation will last many years.

A much more common capacitor (non electrolytic) failure is on AC motor start and run capacitors and "X2" rated mains filter caps on appliances.
Last edited by marshman on Sun Jun 11, 2023 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply