subsea infrastructure vulnerability

Any news worthy story. Good things to watch at the Cinema, Theatre, on TV or have you read a good book lately?
Post Reply
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8089
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#2

Post by Joeboy »

I was a part of that job. Shallow enough that air divers could have hit it if on the right gas. Heliox or similar. Could do it off the back of a zodiac. All this pish about submarines is just that, pish.

Hell, they could do it from within the pipe it's got enough of a bore and it's been shutdown for maintenance for long enough....

Although there were a vast amount of post WW1& 2 munitions dumps that we went past laying it. Unlikely though as it was pre surveyed and a corridor cleared.
19.7kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN & DW
Ripple 7kW WT & Gen to date 19MWh
42kWh LFPO4 storage
95kWh Heater storage
12kWh 210ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
Zoned GCH & Hive 2
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#3

Post by Oldgreybeard »

Not at all difficult for divers to exit from one of the specialist sabotage submarines that the Russian Navy has been operating for years. I remember them being caught sabotaging the SOSUS array in the 1970's, using a specialist sub, and they were caught again trying to tap into an undersea cable not that long ago.

This was almost certainly people from the Russian dirty tricks team that have sabotaged both pipelines. Both pipelines have been damaged in international waters, so it isn't officially an act of aggression, although that is obviously how Russia wants it to be seen, yet without them officially getting the blame.

The risk is that Russia has the capability to sabotage just about any bit of underwater infrastructure. The specialised submarine they developed for undersea cable tapping could very easily be used to cripple the communication cables that almost all of the internet relies on. As I'm typing this there is a fairly good chance that some of the content on the post that appears here will have come down one of the hundreds of undersea cables that span the globe.

I rather suspect Russia is just showing that they can really screw with our lives, big time, and without outright war, if they so wish.

This site has more info on the "GUGI" submarines and their capabilities: https://lynceans.org/all-posts/you-need ... arch-gugi/
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5783
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#4

Post by nowty »

I thought this was a very under reported story yesterday.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63057966
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#5

Post by Oldgreybeard »

This quote from that site linked earlier about Russian undersea capabilities lists what they can do (my added highlight on the last key capability):
The GUGI fleet provides deep ocean and Arctic operating capabilities that greatly exceed those of any other nation. Potential missions include:
  • Conducting subsea surveys, mapping and sampling (i.e., to help validate Russia’s extended continental shelf claims in the Arctic; to map potential future targets such as seafloor cables)
  • Placing and/or retrieving items on the sea floor (i.e., retrieving military hardware, placing subsea power sources, power distribution systems and sonar arrays)
  • Maintaining military subsea equipment and systems
  • Conducting covert surveillance
  • Developing an operational capability to deploy the Poseidon strategic nuclear torpedo.
  • In time of war, attacking the subsea infrastructure of other nations in the open ocean or in the Arctic (i.e., cutting subsea internet cables, power cables or oil / gas pipelines)

Analysts at the firm Policy Exchange reported that the world’s undersea cable network comprises about 213 independent cable systems and 545,018 miles (877,121 km) of fiber-optic cable. These undersea cable networks carry an estimated 97% of global communications and $10 trillion in daily financial transactions are transmitted by cables under the ocean.
My guess is that Russia used one of the GUGI assets to cut both pipelines. Easy for them to just sail around from their base in the Barents Sea to the Baltic, do the deed (possibly with timed demolition charges) and then bugger off and claim they had nothing to do with it.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8089
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#6

Post by Joeboy »

Indeed, yet my point is that you don't need a submarine to hit these lines. In fact you don't even need a ship.or diver. You could knock a hole in one for under 20 grand.
19.7kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN & DW
Ripple 7kW WT & Gen to date 19MWh
42kWh LFPO4 storage
95kWh Heater storage
12kWh 210ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
Zoned GCH & Hive 2
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5783
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#7

Post by nowty »

Oldgreybeard wrote: Wed Sep 28, 2022 3:04 pm This site has more info on the "GUGI" submarines and their capabilities: https://lynceans.org/all-posts/you-need ... arch-gugi/
Reminds me about midget submarines used in WW2 with their,
The weapons on the "X-Craft" were two side-cargoes – explosive charges held on opposite sides of the hull with two tons of amatol in each.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-class_submarine

In comparison, the reporting is only talking about 100kg of explosives with these alleged gas pipeline attacks.
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Oldgreybeard
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 3:42 pm
Location: North East Dorset

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#8

Post by Oldgreybeard »

I once took down a tree with just two wraps of cordtex around it, so just a few tens of grammes of explosive. Doesn't take much to cut through round tubes with a carefully placed charge.

The great thing about the Russian undersea sabotage capability is that their submarines give them plausible deniability. With no tracked surface traffic, and the Baltic being a sub-hunting nightmare because of the very high undersea noise levels, they can do as they wish there. North Sea is the same, it's so very noisy that tracking submarines is exceptionally challenging.
25 off 250W Perlight solar panels, installed 2014, with a 6kW PowerOne inverter, about 6,000kWh/year generated
6 off Pylontech US3000C batteries, with a Sofar ME3000SP inverter
User avatar
Stinsy
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 1:09 pm

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#9

Post by Stinsy »

Oldgreybeard wrote: Wed Sep 28, 2022 3:54 pm I once took down a tree with just two wraps of cordtex around it, so just a few tens of grammes of explosive. Doesn't take much to cut through round tubes with a carefully placed charge.

The great thing about the Russian undersea sabotage capability is that their submarines give them plausible deniability. With no tracked surface traffic, and the Baltic being a sub-hunting nightmare because of the very high undersea noise levels, they can do as they wish there. North Sea is the same, it's so very noisy that tracking submarines is exceptionally challenging.
Works even better underwater...
12x 340W JA Solar panels (4.08kWp)
3x 380W JA Solar panels (1.14kWp)
5x 2.4kWh Pylontech batteries (12kWh)
LuxPower inverter/charger

(Artist formally known as ******, well it should be obvious enough to those for whom such things are important.)
Tinbum
Posts: 1115
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 9:55 pm

Re: subsea infrastructure vulnerability

#10

Post by Tinbum »

You can bet that the authorities here know exactly who did it, say no more!
85no 58mm solar thermal tubes, 28.5Kw PV, 3x Sunny Island 5048, 2795 Ah (135kWh) (c20) Rolls batteries 48v, 8kWh Growatt storage, 22 x US3000C Pylontech, Sofar ME3000's, Brosley wood burner and 250lt DHW
Post Reply