I wouldn't go as far as 'highly dangerous' but, spending ££££ or even £££££ on battery cells, and then placing your trust in a single electronic voltage control system to ensure they never get over/under charged or charged when too cold, seems a bit silly if you can add an independent backup system (bms) for ££.Stinsy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 9:17 amYou're welcome to carry on thinking that. However it isn't true. Clutching pearls and spreading baseless fear isn't allowed on this forum. I'm not the policeman around here. But I should warn you that others have been booted for similar...Tinbum wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 9:13 amYes highly dangerous.Stinsy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 6:05 am
“Highly dangerous”?
I think you should put down the pearls and apply a bit more common sense! In the real world it all, comes down to how hard you’re running the batteries. 2C? You definitely should consider temperature measurement (and active heating/cooling). 0.2C? Just not required!
I know common sense is highly frowned upon now but I have loads of it and use it all the time.
It's nothing to do with how hard you are running them.
I've seen a few too many failed electronic devices (including mppt charge controllers failed short cct - so they just pass all charge to the battery) to rely on one system without an additional failsafe. Even when my battery was all lead acid (which are quite abuse resistant) i would usually have one backup system.
I suppose if your batteries are in an outbuilding and you have the £££££ to replace everything if it all goes pear-shaped you could take the minimalist approach.