Part ownership of a Ripple Wind Turbine, fancy it?

Wind turbines
User avatar
Fintray
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 6:37 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#111

Post by Fintray »

My mate just sent me a link saying:
Dear Sir, your turbine installation is going to be later than anticipated!

Don't get this company to transport the blades for the turbine!
https://www.reddit.com/r/CatastrophicFa ... luling_tx/
3.87kWp PV
10.24kWp PV SolarEdge system
Tesla Powerwall 2
100 x 47mm Navitron tubes (still being installed!) Now likely to be removed for more PV.
MK2 PV router DHW diverter
Morso 5kW WBS
Vaillant AroTherm 10kW ASHP
Nissan Leaf
User avatar
Joeboy
Posts: 8096
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 4:22 pm
Location: Inverurie

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#112

Post by Joeboy »

Oh dear, couldn't make the bend, barriers came down, no comms to train & goodnight!
19.7kW PV SE, VI, HM, EN & DW
Ripple 7kW WT & Gen to date 19MWh
42kWh LFPO4 storage
95kWh Heater storage
12kWh 210ltr HWT.
73kWh HI5
Deep insulation, air leak ct'd home
Zoned GCH & Hive 2
WBSx2
Low energy bulbs
Veg patches & fruit trees
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5791
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#113

Post by nowty »

And from another angle, I'm going have nightmares tonight. :?

https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2021/08 ... -luling-2/
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#114

Post by AE-NMidlands »

There is never any comms to train that can make any difference at all in these circumstances. Those trains might take a couple of miles to stop, and it's why railways have signal sections - and entering an occupied one is usually a sacking offence.
The road hauliers were off the planned route, and not professional enough to go back and pick it up again, or even stop and check their options.
Several of the comments point out that at every crossing in the USA there is a sign saying "Call the railroad" with the phone number.
Anyone remember Hixon Green here in the UK? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hixon_rail_crash That prompted a tightening up...

p.s. the US train stopped quite quickly, but there is still a risk of derailment (and jacknifing) of the train in those events. Often destruction of track and vehicles follows - on top of the loss of the freight in the cars. The insurer (i.e. all the rest of us) might pay for it, but I doubt that the guilty party will see anything like enough costs to change their behaviour.
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5791
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#115

Post by nowty »

Oh dear, I've just paid £25 to reserve up to 900w in the next ripple wind farm even though,

a) The first one is not yet built. :oops:

b) There is no information about it. :o

If you are already a member, then if you log into your ripple account, you will see the invitation. Although I maybe already over the 120%, I'm sure my second EV will change that. :mrgreen:
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#116

Post by AE-NMidlands »

Interestingly, the Lochaber one lists construction or other delays and potentially missing out on FITs as a risk... That must apply here too, although the risk may be minimised for "a bit more of the same!"
I wonder whether government will realise that they need to keep encouraging this sort of thign and extend FITs?
A
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5791
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#117

Post by nowty »

There is no FITs for Onshore Wind anymore, ripple wind turbine one does not have FITs.
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#118

Post by AE-NMidlands »

deleted - duplicated.
Last edited by AE-NMidlands on Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
AE-NMidlands
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:10 pm

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#119

Post by AE-NMidlands »

That's interesting, I wonder why they even mentioned it then... It's not different in Scotland, is it?
They might have shot themselves in the foot with outdated premises, maybe the scheme was originally developed when there were FITs?
A
2.0 kW/4.62 MWh pa in Ripples, 4.5 kWp W-facing pv, 9.5 kWh batt
30 solar thermal tubes, 2MWh pa in Stockport, plus Congleton and Kinlochbervie Hydros,
Most travel by bike, walking or bus/train. Veg, fruit - and Bees!
User avatar
nowty
Posts: 5791
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:36 pm
Location: South Coast

Re: Part ownership of a Wind Turbine, fancy it?

#120

Post by nowty »

AE-NMidlands wrote: Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:35 pm That's interesting, I wonder why they even mentioned it then... It's not different in Scotland, is it?
They might have shot themselves in the foot with outdated premises, maybe the scheme was originally developed when there were FITs?
A
The Lochaber project is hydro where FITs still exist in some exceptions.

Edit - OK, I don't think its necessarily hydro, but some exceptions still exist where an application was submitted before the closure date. There was a 12 month grace period but COVID may have extended the deadlines.

https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications/f ... me-closure
18.7kW PV > 109MWh generated
Ripple 6.6kW Wind + 4.5kW PV > 26MWh generated
5 Other RE Coop's
105kWh EV storage
60kWh Home battery storage
40kWh Thermal storage
GSHP + A2A HP's
Rain water use > 510 m3
Post Reply