PLEASE NOTE THAT I DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE FOR THIS
I assume they offered shares for a fixed period, then used debt to fund the rest.
Releasing extra shares would reduce the debt element as opposed to diluting the existing shares.
PLEASE NOTE THAT I DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE FOR THIS
Nah man, that's paranoid!.Mr Gus wrote: ↑Wed Jul 12, 2023 1:52 pm Wonder if the person who highlighted that (put it out on the forum has had a behaviour warning from ripple? as to being offensive for asking pertinent questions about the general operations of ripple & its non notification to all & sundry. "affecting the community" ...I always think anyone drawing a salary has responsibility ..am I wrong?
This is why I said the marketing team appeared to be non responsive to requests / timely obviously needed changes & info putting out (considering how many of them there are / were in a huddle in the london? hq offices with disposable coffee cups, ..(hard to recycle yes)!?
If they were looking at saving money is the cost of a london office compared with many other cities / towns really necessary in the first instance?
I've done some calculations, based on the following assumptions,John_S wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 3:05 pm On a reasonable balance of the PPA price paid and interest rates, the loan plus interest should be repaid in under 10 years. After that member should benefit as there is a large chunk of generation income which no longer services the debt and can be paid to members.
They have not announced the final figures yet but based on 8800 members (as at 24 days ago), an average amount of £2200 (GF and KH figures) we get close to £20M or half of the £39.5M required. There may be other businesses or individuals (£100k+) in there too, we know Encosia pledged 250,000 Euros. So I hope its no worse than 1/3 of it is financed on borrowing.