dan_b wrote: ↑Thu May 02, 2024 1:21 pm
EDF submits its proposals for 4x EPR1200s for the Czech power sector.
These would be "Version 2s" of the EPR design being built at HPC - lower output but apparently much simpler and cheaper to build.
An automatic reactor scram is never good event, if a reactor has to be shut down its preferable for the operators to be aware and conducted their own reactor shut down then at least they can be said to be in control. Automatic shut down suggests the instrumentation had to do the task because the control room did not act quickly enough.
Another calamity along the route for this reactor type.
Ken wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 12:19 pm
Thiers cost 13B and ours will cost 40B -you what ?
Can't polish the HPC turd, but I'll attempt to roll it in glitter:
HPC was started later so higher cost as nuclear tends to have a negative learning curve*, and HPC is two ~1.6GW reactors, whilst Flamanville is just one.
*I believe it's the only industry in history to have a negative learning curve, mainly because ever more stringent safety levels are required due to the scale of 'disaster' that the edge cases cause.
8.7kWp PV [2.12kWp SSW + 4.61kWp ESE PV + 2.0kWp WNW PV]
Two BEV's.
Two small A2A heatpumps.
20kWh Battery storage.